Review



pd-1, human  (MedChemExpress)


Bioz Verified Symbol MedChemExpress is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol MedChemExpress manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 92

    Structured Review

    MedChemExpress pd-1, human
    Pd 1, Human, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 2 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/pd-1, human/product/MedChemExpress
    Average 92 stars, based on 2 article reviews
    pd-1, human - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    92/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    92
    MedChemExpress pd-1, human
    Pd 1, Human, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/pd-1, human/product/MedChemExpress
    Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    pd-1, human - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    92/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    MedChemExpress mce hy p7396 blinatumomab mce hy p9963 fty720 mce hy
    Mce Hy P7396 Blinatumomab Mce Hy P9963 Fty720 Mce Hy, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mce hy p7396 blinatumomab mce hy p9963 fty720 mce hy/product/MedChemExpress
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mce hy p7396 blinatumomab mce hy p9963 fty720 mce hy - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    92
    MedChemExpress hy p7396
    Hy P7396, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/hy p7396/product/MedChemExpress
    Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    hy p7396 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    92/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    92
    MedChemExpress recombinant human pd 1
    Synthesis and characterization of αPD-1-(iRGD) 2 (A) The pattern diagram of the structure and chemical synthesis procedures of αPD-1-(iRGD) 2 . (B) Production of core substrate GDP-fucose-iRGD. (C) ESI-MS characterization of αPD-1-(iRGD) 2 . (D and E) The binding affinity of αPD-1-(iRGD) 2 and unmodified antibody toward human (D) and murine <t>(E)</t> <t>PD-1</t> protein by ELISA. (F) Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) fold change of PD-1-Jurkat cells after being incubated with αPD-1 or αPD-1-(iRGD) 2 for 1 h. Data represent mean ± SEM; for (D)–(F), n = 3. (G–K) Flow cytometric analysis of changes in relative averaged fluorescence intensities of cancer cell lines (N87, HGC27, MFC, and B16) and normal cell line (293T) cocultured with 10 μg/mL αPD-1-(iRGD) 2 or 10 μg/mL αPD-1 before coculturing with anti-human IgG-PE (Abcam, #ab7005). The concentration of free iRGD (Genescript Biotech Corporation) was 100 μg/mL, and αNRP1 (Biolegend, #354502 and #145201) was 15 μg/mL. Data represent mean ± SEM; for (G)–(K), n = 3. For (G)–(J), one-way ANOVA test and Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. n.s., not significant; ∗ p < 0.5; ∗∗ p < 0.01; ∗∗∗ p < 0.001; ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001.
    Recombinant Human Pd 1, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/recombinant human pd 1/product/MedChemExpress
    Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    recombinant human pd 1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    92/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Synthesis and characterization of αPD-1-(iRGD) 2 (A) The pattern diagram of the structure and chemical synthesis procedures of αPD-1-(iRGD) 2 . (B) Production of core substrate GDP-fucose-iRGD. (C) ESI-MS characterization of αPD-1-(iRGD) 2 . (D and E) The binding affinity of αPD-1-(iRGD) 2 and unmodified antibody toward human (D) and murine (E) PD-1 protein by ELISA. (F) Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) fold change of PD-1-Jurkat cells after being incubated with αPD-1 or αPD-1-(iRGD) 2 for 1 h. Data represent mean ± SEM; for (D)–(F), n = 3. (G–K) Flow cytometric analysis of changes in relative averaged fluorescence intensities of cancer cell lines (N87, HGC27, MFC, and B16) and normal cell line (293T) cocultured with 10 μg/mL αPD-1-(iRGD) 2 or 10 μg/mL αPD-1 before coculturing with anti-human IgG-PE (Abcam, #ab7005). The concentration of free iRGD (Genescript Biotech Corporation) was 100 μg/mL, and αNRP1 (Biolegend, #354502 and #145201) was 15 μg/mL. Data represent mean ± SEM; for (G)–(K), n = 3. For (G)–(J), one-way ANOVA test and Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. n.s., not significant; ∗ p < 0.5; ∗∗ p < 0.01; ∗∗∗ p < 0.001; ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001.

    Journal: Cell Reports Medicine

    Article Title: Glycoengineering-based anti-PD-1-iRGD peptide conjugate boosts antitumor efficacy through T cell engagement

    doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2024.101590

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Synthesis and characterization of αPD-1-(iRGD) 2 (A) The pattern diagram of the structure and chemical synthesis procedures of αPD-1-(iRGD) 2 . (B) Production of core substrate GDP-fucose-iRGD. (C) ESI-MS characterization of αPD-1-(iRGD) 2 . (D and E) The binding affinity of αPD-1-(iRGD) 2 and unmodified antibody toward human (D) and murine (E) PD-1 protein by ELISA. (F) Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) fold change of PD-1-Jurkat cells after being incubated with αPD-1 or αPD-1-(iRGD) 2 for 1 h. Data represent mean ± SEM; for (D)–(F), n = 3. (G–K) Flow cytometric analysis of changes in relative averaged fluorescence intensities of cancer cell lines (N87, HGC27, MFC, and B16) and normal cell line (293T) cocultured with 10 μg/mL αPD-1-(iRGD) 2 or 10 μg/mL αPD-1 before coculturing with anti-human IgG-PE (Abcam, #ab7005). The concentration of free iRGD (Genescript Biotech Corporation) was 100 μg/mL, and αNRP1 (Biolegend, #354502 and #145201) was 15 μg/mL. Data represent mean ± SEM; for (G)–(K), n = 3. For (G)–(J), one-way ANOVA test and Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. n.s., not significant; ∗ p < 0.5; ∗∗ p < 0.01; ∗∗∗ p < 0.001; ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001.

    Article Snippet: Recombinant human PD-1 (HEK293, His) , MCE , HY-P7396.

    Techniques: Binding Assay, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Fluorescence, Incubation, Concentration Assay

    Antitumor efficacy of αPD-1-(iRGD) 2 (A) Schematic of the treatment regimen in MFC mouse gastric tumor model. Briefly, mice were treated with 1 × 10 6 MFC cells and injected intraperitoneally with PBS (100 μL), αPD-1 (5 mg/kg) alone, or with free iRGD (2.5 μg) and αPD-1-(iRGD) 2 (5 mg/kg) every 3 days. (B and C) Tumor growth profile (B) and weight (C) of tumors collected at the endpoint of (A). (D) Schematic of the treatment regimen in B16F10 mouse melanoma tumor model. Briefly, mice were treated with 1 × 10 5 B16F10 cells and injected intraperitoneally with PBS (100 μL control), αPD-1(5 mg/kg) alone, or with free iRGD (2.5 μg) and αPD-1-(iRGD) 2 (5 mg/kg) every 3 days. (E and F) Tumor growth profile (E) and weight (F) of tumors collected at the endpoint of (D). (G) Survival plot of MFC mouse gastric cancer model. Briefly, mice were treated with 1 × 10 6 MFC cells and injected intraperitoneally with PBS (100 μL control), αPD-1 (5 mg/kg) alone, or with free iRGD (4 μmol/kg) and αPD-1-(iRGD) 2 (5 mg/kg) every 3 days. A total of 4 injections were assigned to each mouse. (H–P) Quantitative flow cytometry results indicating the abundance and characteristics of TILs in an MFC model. 4- to 6-week-old 615 mice were treated with 1 × 10 6 MFC cells and injected intraperitoneally with PBS (100 μL), αPD-1 (5 mg/kg) alone, or with free iRGD(4 μmol/kg) and αPD-1-(iRGD) 2 (5 mg/kg) every 3 days. (H) CD3 + T cells, (I) CD4 + T cells, (J) CD8 + T cells, (K) PD-1 + CD8 + T cells, (L) IFNγ + CD8 + T cells, (M) CD137 + CD8 + T cells, (N) Ki67 + CD8 + T cells, (O) CD137 + CD4 + T cells, and (P) Ki67 + CD4 + T cells. Flow cytometry plots here utilized the following agents: anti-mouse CD3-FITC (Biolegend, #100204), anti-mouse CD3e-PC7 (Biolegend, #100320), anti-mouse CD4-PE (Biolegend, #100408), anti-mouse CD8-APC (Biolegend, #100712), anti-mouse CD8-FITC (Biolegend, #100706), anti-mouse Ki67-PC7 (Biolegend, #151217), anti-mouse PD-1-PerCP5.5 (Biolegend, #124334), anti-mouse IFNγ-PerCP5.5 (Biolegend, #505822), and anti-mouse CD137-PE (Biolegend, #106106). Data represent mean ± SEM; for (A)–(F), n = 6; for (G), n = 8; for (H)–(P), n = 5. For (B) and (E), two-way ANOVA test and Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. For (C), (F), and (H)–(P), one-way ANOVA test and Tukey’s multiple comparisons test; n.s., not significant; ∗ p < 0.5; ∗∗ p < 0.01; ∗∗∗ p < 0.001; ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001.

    Journal: Cell Reports Medicine

    Article Title: Glycoengineering-based anti-PD-1-iRGD peptide conjugate boosts antitumor efficacy through T cell engagement

    doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2024.101590

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Antitumor efficacy of αPD-1-(iRGD) 2 (A) Schematic of the treatment regimen in MFC mouse gastric tumor model. Briefly, mice were treated with 1 × 10 6 MFC cells and injected intraperitoneally with PBS (100 μL), αPD-1 (5 mg/kg) alone, or with free iRGD (2.5 μg) and αPD-1-(iRGD) 2 (5 mg/kg) every 3 days. (B and C) Tumor growth profile (B) and weight (C) of tumors collected at the endpoint of (A). (D) Schematic of the treatment regimen in B16F10 mouse melanoma tumor model. Briefly, mice were treated with 1 × 10 5 B16F10 cells and injected intraperitoneally with PBS (100 μL control), αPD-1(5 mg/kg) alone, or with free iRGD (2.5 μg) and αPD-1-(iRGD) 2 (5 mg/kg) every 3 days. (E and F) Tumor growth profile (E) and weight (F) of tumors collected at the endpoint of (D). (G) Survival plot of MFC mouse gastric cancer model. Briefly, mice were treated with 1 × 10 6 MFC cells and injected intraperitoneally with PBS (100 μL control), αPD-1 (5 mg/kg) alone, or with free iRGD (4 μmol/kg) and αPD-1-(iRGD) 2 (5 mg/kg) every 3 days. A total of 4 injections were assigned to each mouse. (H–P) Quantitative flow cytometry results indicating the abundance and characteristics of TILs in an MFC model. 4- to 6-week-old 615 mice were treated with 1 × 10 6 MFC cells and injected intraperitoneally with PBS (100 μL), αPD-1 (5 mg/kg) alone, or with free iRGD(4 μmol/kg) and αPD-1-(iRGD) 2 (5 mg/kg) every 3 days. (H) CD3 + T cells, (I) CD4 + T cells, (J) CD8 + T cells, (K) PD-1 + CD8 + T cells, (L) IFNγ + CD8 + T cells, (M) CD137 + CD8 + T cells, (N) Ki67 + CD8 + T cells, (O) CD137 + CD4 + T cells, and (P) Ki67 + CD4 + T cells. Flow cytometry plots here utilized the following agents: anti-mouse CD3-FITC (Biolegend, #100204), anti-mouse CD3e-PC7 (Biolegend, #100320), anti-mouse CD4-PE (Biolegend, #100408), anti-mouse CD8-APC (Biolegend, #100712), anti-mouse CD8-FITC (Biolegend, #100706), anti-mouse Ki67-PC7 (Biolegend, #151217), anti-mouse PD-1-PerCP5.5 (Biolegend, #124334), anti-mouse IFNγ-PerCP5.5 (Biolegend, #505822), and anti-mouse CD137-PE (Biolegend, #106106). Data represent mean ± SEM; for (A)–(F), n = 6; for (G), n = 8; for (H)–(P), n = 5. For (B) and (E), two-way ANOVA test and Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. For (C), (F), and (H)–(P), one-way ANOVA test and Tukey’s multiple comparisons test; n.s., not significant; ∗ p < 0.5; ∗∗ p < 0.01; ∗∗∗ p < 0.001; ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001.

    Article Snippet: Recombinant human PD-1 (HEK293, His) , MCE , HY-P7396.

    Techniques: Injection, Control, Flow Cytometry

    Antitumor efficacy of αPD-1-(iRGD) 2 depends on pre-existing intra-tumoral CD8 + T cells (A) Schematic of the T cell migration inhibition regimen in MFC mouse gastric tumor model. Briefly, mice were treated with 1 × 10 6 MFC cells and injected intraperitoneally with PBS (100 μL control), αPD-1-(iRGD) 2 (5 mg/kg), and FTY720 (MCE, #HY-12005, 20 μg) every 3 days. (B) Flow cytometry analysis of T cell abundance in peripheral blood to validate the T cell migration inhibition of FTY720. (C) Tumor growth profile of (A). (D) Schematic of the CD8 + T cell depletion regimen in MFC mouse gastric tumor model. Briefly, mice were treated with 1 × 10 6 MFC cells and injected intraperitoneally with PBS (100 μL control), αPD-1-(iRGD) 2 (5 mg/kg), and αCD8 (BioXCell, #BE0117, 200 μg) every 3 days. (E) Flow cytometry analysis of CD8 + T cell abundance in tumor to validate CD8 + T cell depletion. (F) Tumor growth profile of CD8 + T cell depletion assay. (G) Schematic of the treatment regimen in MFC mouse gastric tumor model. Briefly, mice were treated with 1 × 10 6 MFC cells and injected intraperitoneally with PBS (100 μL control), αPD-1 (0.1 mg/kg) alone, or with free iRGD (4 μmol/kg) and αPD-1-(iRGD) 2 (0.1 mg/kg). (H) Weight of murine subcutaneous tumors resected at the end of (G). (I) Tumor growth profile of (G). (J) Flow cytometry results indicating the abundance of CD8 + T cell (Biolegend, #100702) from resected tumor bulk at the endpoint of (G). (K) Flow cytometry quantification of PD-1 (Biolegend, #135206) expression on CD8 + T cell from resected tumor bulk at the endpoint of (G). (L) Flow cytometry quantification of CD39 (Biolegend, #143806) expression on PD-1 + CD8 + T cells from resected tumor bulk at the endpoint of (F). (M and N) Flow cytometry results indicating the abundance of CD4 + T cell (Biolegend, #100408) (M) and Treg (Biolegend, #320014 and #100412; eBioscience, #12-0251-83) (N) from resected tumor bulk at the endpoint of (G). (O) Flow cytometry analysis of propidium-iodide-positive tumor cells preloaded with GP33 (Genescript Biotech Corporation, 500 nM) or SIINFEKL peptide (Genescript Biotech Corporation, 500 nM) after simultaneously coculturing with OT-I cells. The ratio of unprimed, GP33-primed, SIINFEKL-primed B16F10 cells, and OT-I cells was 1:1:1:10. Concentration of αPD-1 and αPD-1-(iRGD) 2 was 10 μg/mL, and that of iRGD was 100 μg/mL (P) Flow cytometry analysis of activation markers (CD25 and CD69) on OT-I cells and spleen T cells simultaneously cocultured with SIINFEKL peptide (500 nM) preloaded tumor cells. The ratio of OT-I cells, non-specific spleen T cells, and SIINFEKL-primed B16 cells was 5:5:1. (Q) Histogram of the percentage of conjugated cells when 2 × 10 5 Dye 670-stained NY-ESO-1 157-165 -primed HLA-A∗0201-Raji cells were cocultured 1 h with mixed 2 × 10 4 CFSE-stained 1G4-PD-1-Jurkat cells and 2 × 10 4 Dye 450-stained PD-1-Jurkat cells. The concentration of αPD-1-(iRGD) 2 was 10 μg/mL, while blinatumomab (MCE, #HY-P9963) was 1 μg/mL (R) Histogram of CD69 (Biolegend, #319102) expression on 1G4-PD-1-Jurkat and PD-1-Jurkat under the same condition in (P). (S) Flow cytometry chart of (Q). (T) Flow cytometry chart of (R). Data represent mean ± SEM. For (B) and (O)–(T), n = 3. For (C), (E), (F), and (H)–(N), n = 5. For (B), (E), (H), and (J)–(M), one-way ANOVA test and Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. For (C), (F), (I), and (O)–(R), two-way ANOVA test and Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. n.s., not significant; ∗ p < 0.5; ∗∗ p < 0.01; ∗∗∗ p < 0.001; ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001.

    Journal: Cell Reports Medicine

    Article Title: Glycoengineering-based anti-PD-1-iRGD peptide conjugate boosts antitumor efficacy through T cell engagement

    doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2024.101590

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Antitumor efficacy of αPD-1-(iRGD) 2 depends on pre-existing intra-tumoral CD8 + T cells (A) Schematic of the T cell migration inhibition regimen in MFC mouse gastric tumor model. Briefly, mice were treated with 1 × 10 6 MFC cells and injected intraperitoneally with PBS (100 μL control), αPD-1-(iRGD) 2 (5 mg/kg), and FTY720 (MCE, #HY-12005, 20 μg) every 3 days. (B) Flow cytometry analysis of T cell abundance in peripheral blood to validate the T cell migration inhibition of FTY720. (C) Tumor growth profile of (A). (D) Schematic of the CD8 + T cell depletion regimen in MFC mouse gastric tumor model. Briefly, mice were treated with 1 × 10 6 MFC cells and injected intraperitoneally with PBS (100 μL control), αPD-1-(iRGD) 2 (5 mg/kg), and αCD8 (BioXCell, #BE0117, 200 μg) every 3 days. (E) Flow cytometry analysis of CD8 + T cell abundance in tumor to validate CD8 + T cell depletion. (F) Tumor growth profile of CD8 + T cell depletion assay. (G) Schematic of the treatment regimen in MFC mouse gastric tumor model. Briefly, mice were treated with 1 × 10 6 MFC cells and injected intraperitoneally with PBS (100 μL control), αPD-1 (0.1 mg/kg) alone, or with free iRGD (4 μmol/kg) and αPD-1-(iRGD) 2 (0.1 mg/kg). (H) Weight of murine subcutaneous tumors resected at the end of (G). (I) Tumor growth profile of (G). (J) Flow cytometry results indicating the abundance of CD8 + T cell (Biolegend, #100702) from resected tumor bulk at the endpoint of (G). (K) Flow cytometry quantification of PD-1 (Biolegend, #135206) expression on CD8 + T cell from resected tumor bulk at the endpoint of (G). (L) Flow cytometry quantification of CD39 (Biolegend, #143806) expression on PD-1 + CD8 + T cells from resected tumor bulk at the endpoint of (F). (M and N) Flow cytometry results indicating the abundance of CD4 + T cell (Biolegend, #100408) (M) and Treg (Biolegend, #320014 and #100412; eBioscience, #12-0251-83) (N) from resected tumor bulk at the endpoint of (G). (O) Flow cytometry analysis of propidium-iodide-positive tumor cells preloaded with GP33 (Genescript Biotech Corporation, 500 nM) or SIINFEKL peptide (Genescript Biotech Corporation, 500 nM) after simultaneously coculturing with OT-I cells. The ratio of unprimed, GP33-primed, SIINFEKL-primed B16F10 cells, and OT-I cells was 1:1:1:10. Concentration of αPD-1 and αPD-1-(iRGD) 2 was 10 μg/mL, and that of iRGD was 100 μg/mL (P) Flow cytometry analysis of activation markers (CD25 and CD69) on OT-I cells and spleen T cells simultaneously cocultured with SIINFEKL peptide (500 nM) preloaded tumor cells. The ratio of OT-I cells, non-specific spleen T cells, and SIINFEKL-primed B16 cells was 5:5:1. (Q) Histogram of the percentage of conjugated cells when 2 × 10 5 Dye 670-stained NY-ESO-1 157-165 -primed HLA-A∗0201-Raji cells were cocultured 1 h with mixed 2 × 10 4 CFSE-stained 1G4-PD-1-Jurkat cells and 2 × 10 4 Dye 450-stained PD-1-Jurkat cells. The concentration of αPD-1-(iRGD) 2 was 10 μg/mL, while blinatumomab (MCE, #HY-P9963) was 1 μg/mL (R) Histogram of CD69 (Biolegend, #319102) expression on 1G4-PD-1-Jurkat and PD-1-Jurkat under the same condition in (P). (S) Flow cytometry chart of (Q). (T) Flow cytometry chart of (R). Data represent mean ± SEM. For (B) and (O)–(T), n = 3. For (C), (E), (F), and (H)–(N), n = 5. For (B), (E), (H), and (J)–(M), one-way ANOVA test and Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. For (C), (F), (I), and (O)–(R), two-way ANOVA test and Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. n.s., not significant; ∗ p < 0.5; ∗∗ p < 0.01; ∗∗∗ p < 0.001; ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001.

    Article Snippet: Recombinant human PD-1 (HEK293, His) , MCE , HY-P7396.

    Techniques: Migration, Inhibition, Injection, Control, Flow Cytometry, Depletion Assay, Expressing, Concentration Assay, Activation Assay, Staining

    Journal: Cell Reports Medicine

    Article Title: Glycoengineering-based anti-PD-1-iRGD peptide conjugate boosts antitumor efficacy through T cell engagement

    doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2024.101590

    Figure Lengend Snippet:

    Article Snippet: Recombinant human PD-1 (HEK293, His) , MCE , HY-P7396.

    Techniques: Recombinant, Activation Assay, Flow Cytometry, Membrane, Software